Thursday, 27 December 2012

Contextual Essay

Following a series of lectures on art context we were set the task of choosing a piece of art and writing an essay on it's context. At first I struggled with the idea of this as I did not really understand the way the questions had been written. As I have said before, I do not really understand the language of art. I am much more of a practical person and speak in plain English (something which I have always had to do throughout my working life so as to ensure that everyone listening understands exactly what I am saying). I don't mind admitting that this does tend to hold me back a little when the artistic side of the course is being discussed. After raising these concerns with Steve I was assured that I was capable of completing the essay and we discussed a few ideas and Steve gave me a few examples (in plain English) as a starting point.

At first I wasn't overly confident about completing the essay in the way required but I had a stab at it anyway.

I chose to focus on a film, as this fits in with the media pathway and the film I chose was Che part one.
The final essay is below.

 
An essay on context.

The definition of the word context according to the dictionary is:
noun
  • the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood eg. the proposals need to be considered in the context of new European directives.
  • the parts of something written or spoken that immediately precede and follow a word or passage and clarify its meaning eg. skilled readers use context to construct meaning from words as they are read.
I suppose it is in a way a measure of how the individual parts put together create the authenticity of the whole. For example if you were to put a formula 1 Mercedes engine into a Victorian steam engine, it would no longer be authentic and therefore out of context. However, if this was the direct intention then it would be well within its context. Context is therefore relative to the whole and depends entirely on the intention to determine whether the parts are or are not within context

Exploring the context of film.

For the purposes of this exercise I am focusing on part 1 of the 2008 biopic Che which, directed by Steven Soderbergh, retraces the life of the iconic Cuban revolutionary. Part 1 begins on November 26, 1956,and focuses on the early rise of  Ernesto "Che" Guevara (played by Benicio Del Toro) from politically minded Argentine doctor sharing Fidel Castro’s (played by Demian Bichir) vision of overthrowing corrupt dictator Fulgencio Batista. In Havana 1964, Che Guevara is interviewed by Lisa Howard (Played by Julia Ormond) who asks him if reform throughout Latin America might not blunt the "message of the Cuban Revolution". In 1955, at a gathering in Mexico City, Guevara first meets Fidel Castro). He listens to Castro's plans and signs on as a member of the July 26th Movement. There is a return to 1964 for Guevara's address before the United Nations General Assembly, where he makes an impassioned speech against American imperialism, and defends the executions his regime has committed, declaring "this is a battle to the death." March 1957, Guevara deals with debilitating bouts of asthma as his group of revolutionaries meet up with Castro's group. Together, they attack an army barracks in the Sierra Maestra on May 28, 1957. On October 15, 1958, the guerrillas approach the town of Las Villas. The Battle of Santa Clara is depicted with Guevara demonstrating his tactical skill as the guerrillas engage in street-to-street fighting and derail a train carrying Cuban soldiers and armaments. Near the film's end, they are victorious. With the Cuban Revolution now over, Guevara heads to Havana, remarking “we won the war, the revolution starts now”.

The film aims to tell the story of the man rather than the legend and in Soderbergh’s own words ‘ To break through the barrier of the legend. The aim is not to glorify him but to tell the story of the REAL Che Guevara. The main focus (and at the same time challenge) being to make it authentic.’
So how was this achieved?

Research
An exhaustive amount of research went into the making of the film from experts, director and actors alike all spending years in Cuba talking to friends, families, surviving guerrillas and even Fidel Castro himself. Countless hours were spent at the home of Guevara’s widow reading his books and diaries just to get under the skin of Guevara and to find out just what made him tick and more importantly to get beyond the myth. Even still researchers felt that they had not got to the reality of the man and to do so they had to go back to his roots to discover Ernesto Guevara rather than ‘Che’ and so they took their research back to Argentina in the search for authenticity and to separate the man from the myth. Also staying within that research meant that the scenarios within the film could not be disputed in any way.

Casting
 In a film such as this, casting is an important source of authenticity or context, after all it would be no good casting Arnold Schwarzenegger as the sugar plum fairy (unless for comedy value). Casting  Benicio Del Toro in the title role was the first step to finding this authenticity, Puerto Rican Benicio is from the same part of the world, speaks the lanquage with a similar accent and more to the point had the discipline and ethics to immerse himself in the world of Guevara, his life and his literature to become a personification of the man he was to play. As he said himself ‘The biggest downside to playing Che is the fact that everyone knows him, you are put under a magnifying glass’ in other words it HAS to be believable. The same concept was used when casting all the people who were to play REAL people from the story.
Locations
The location shoots have to be believable and to that end locations in both Puerto Rico and Mexico were used as both have similar landscapes,vegetation buildings etc. to rural Cuba

Language
Soderbergh made the decision to shoot the film in Spanish with English subtitles to add an extra dimension of authenticity even the cutaway to the reconstructed interviews shot during Castro’s  visit to the US. were done in Spanish with a US translation voice over Just as they would have been at the time. In actual fact the US refused funding for the film because of Soderbergh’s insistence on shooting the film in Spanish so as to preserve it’s authenticity.

Authentic footage/camera shots
The use of both authentic and recreated newsreel footage along with recreations of Television interviews and Castro’s appearance at the UN General assembly in 1964 (shot in actual location just before it was renovated). Shooting these scenes in black and white adds an element of authenticity.  The use of soft lighting and 60’s style camera shots when shooting the family scenes early on in the film again adds that dimension of real time authenticity.

Costume and make-up
Due to the time sensitivity of the film the use of authentic clothing both civilian and military was used to depict the time in which the film was set. The actors were also portraying REAL people an as such had to look as though they were those people.
Set design/props
As with the costume, the set and props had to be authentic to the time. The weaponry, buildings, vehicles, furniture, all had to portray authenticity and be from the time in which the film was set. Probably the luckiest break in this area was being able to shoot in the UN building pre renovation as mentioned before.
Music
Music is often used to add drama and feeling to a film. To provoke a reaction or emotion. The one thing I found with this film was the LACK of music had the same effect. There was music and that music was authentic and very Hispanic in its composition (much as it’s composer Alberto Iglesias) which again added that dimension of reality and authenticity. But rather than the usual Hollywood overkill the music was used subtly and very tastefully and rather than its absence detracting from the drama of the scene it allowed the script/screenplay to add the drama in its place. In Iglesias’ own words ‘music is a weapon which can change the significance and it was very difficult to ensure the music for Che did not portray him as a hero, as the intention of the film was not to hail Che as an indisputable hero but to show him as a human with all these contradictions,’
By utilising all the above elements and probably many that I have missed you see a film that is not over dramatised as many Hollywood releases are but one that could easily be mistaken for a documentary, in fact if you were to put it on BBC 2 with a heavily English voice over it probably could be. It oozes authenticity which was the exact intention of the director. Also by deliberately leaving out all the extra bits such as the legend, Che’s private life, His early life etc. You actually get more of a feel for the type of man he was through the depictions of his interactions with the Cuban people, the people around him, his followers and those who fought with him. The film does precisely what it set out to or more to the point NOT to do.
The film was Researched, written and filmed between 2004 and 2008. During which time most of the world was in the ‘Great recession.’ The UK and US were at war in the middle east, The social networking site ‘Facebook’ was launched. The Indian Ocean earthquake and resulting Tsunami caused nearly a quarter of a million deaths, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India and Thailand were the hardest hit. Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans killing almost 2000 people and flooding over 80% of the city. Pluto was demoted from ‘planet’ to ‘Dwarf planet’ status. The West African Black Rhino was declared extinct. And In a major scientific breakthrough, a Japanese company developed a way of analysing electrical signals sent from the visual cortex of the brain and converting them to digital images on screen.

 

work experience - Child action North West (Cancelled)

Unfortunately due to an incident during a location shoot Jamie has made the decision to pull the project. Whilst this is disappointing, the line had to be drawn somewhere. It had become obvious that whilst we were doing our utmost to provide a professional service and a finished product of the highest quality, CANW obviously assumed that we were just college students and as such could be treated unprofessionally and to be honest with absolutely no respect for what we were doing. As I say, a line had to be drawn and unfortunately only Jamie could make that decision. 

Jamie continued to finish the filming himself in order to fulfil the college commitment and the final films can be viewed by following the links below:

Trevor
Sarah
Rob
Julia
Foster Carers
Debbie
Candy
Anita